Anti-Federalists

Art by - Grunuffy @ deviantart.com

There are many different aspects and concepts that you'd have to face while making a Federalist government. One of the greatest fears is that the greater officer in the Republic may start being idolized and viewed a more than the average colonists. By doing so, these officers may start taking more control and abusing their power. Another bad thing about having a small group of legislatures is that the small amounts will most likely lead to corruption, bribery may occur between states. This will also make the little confidence in the government that the people might have even smaller. To gain the encouragement and the affection of the people, the government may have to resort to force.  Lastly, diversity will be one of the largest problems in this type of government system. Everybody is from different regions of the nation which all have their own unique way of interpreting the situation. This will most likely cause the government to never be able to agree on anything. Lastly some states may be ignored or not valued as highly as other states as stated by The Federal Farmer (Henry Richard Lee) on October 9th, 1787 

"The essential parts of a free and good government are a full and equal representation of the people on the legislature"

Smaller and less wealthy states might be put down by the larger states that have more power and wealth. 

Citations 

Image - Anti-Federalist. Digital image. Deviantart.com. DeviantArt, 2012. Web. 3 May 2015. 

Quote - Lee, Henry R. "The Federal Farmer (Henry Richard Lee) No.2." Federal Farmer. 9 Oct. 1787. Web. 3 May 2015.

Voices of the Revolution

Statement: "Before 1779 the reason's for an individual's support for or opposition to independence were primarily economic."

Though there was quite a lot of talk about how this major decision of support against or for the British was solely economic, we also must think about the other factors when it came to making this choice. You can take Charles Inglis as a fair example. Charles Inglis, a colonist none the less, thought heavily and thoroughly upon this matter in his article "Charles Inglis The True Intrest of America Impartially Stated in 1776" and had came to the conclusion that it would be an unwise option to separate from Britain. 

In his article he describes the pros and cons of reconciling with Britain and all of his counterargument were all based on one key foundation - peace. He describes peace to be "...like health; we do not sufficiently know its value but by it's absence," (Charles Inglis). He says that if we stay with the British, our agriculture, commerce, and industry would continue on at a regular pace, but not only that, we'll also have the largest naval power in the world. The cheap imported good galore, what's not to love? He also rightfully said nearing the ending that even if we have the French military by our side, the French have already made peace with the British - who are we to say if they are going to help us or not?        

Sources

Picture - 
We the People. Digital image. Voice the Planet. Stuart L. Hart., n.d. Web. 09 Feb. 2015.
Information - 
Inglis, Charles. "Charles Iglis The True Interest of America Impartiality Stated in 1776." (1776): 1-4. Web. 10 Feb. 2015.

Letter to John Locke

Dear Sir Locke,

I am just a humble writer and was asked to write the document in which we are to declare independence against the British. I have been a large follower of your works for ages now and have decided to use your winged words in this document. One of the major examples may be your concept of the functioning government. As I recall, the functioning government must ensure the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for the people - which I mention extensively. I also added to the document that if the government fails to meet these basic requirements, then it mandatory for the people to take a stand and assemble a different government. Thank you once again.

Sincerly,

Thomas Jefferson